Senior Southeast Asia representative Shawn Crispin this week
presented CPJ's concerns about new media visa restrictions for foreign
reporters based in Thailand to a group of Bangkok-based ambassadors. The
controversial measures, announced last month by the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, are scheduled to come into force on March 21. The text of Crispin's
speech follows:
Your Excellencies,
Thank you very much for the opportunity to speak before this
distinguished audience. I currently serve as Southeast Asia representative to
the Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based, non-partisan
independent organization that, through monitoring, research and advocacy,
promotes press freedom worldwide. I've covered press freedom developments for the
entire Southeast Asia region, including Thailand, for the past decade.
CPJ has expressed consistent concerns about the steady
erosion of press and Internet freedoms in Thailand since the 2014 military coup
and suspension of democracy. Throughout my 17 years of journalistic experience
based in Thailand, the situation for reporters, apart from when bullets are
flying in the national capital during political protests, has never been more
dire. Reporters operate in a climate of fear and uncertainty, never sure
exactly where the line between permissible and off-limits reporting lies. Local
journalists who have crossed that vague line have suffered increasingly harsh
reprisals, including so-called "attitude adjustment" sessions in
military custody.
Depending how that particular security-related guideline is
interpreted and implemented, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will have broad
new discretionary powers to deny media visas on the basis of an individual
journalist's news coverage. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs originally said
that the new revised criteria were drafted in response to the "changing
nature of new media and to re-categorize personnel eligible to media
visas", and not designed to restrict or reduce the number of foreign
journalists in Thailand.
If Thailand truly wanted to get in step with the changing
nature of global media, it would implement measures that aimed to promote and
protect freelancers, not restrict them. Faced with broken business models and
ever tightening news budgets, a growing number of the world's major news
organizations rely on freelancers for their coverage of outpost countries like
Thailand. The willful elimination of freelancers will effectively pull the plug
on a vast amount of diverse and original reporting on Thailand Visa. That, in turn,
will give the government more leverage on news organizations with established
bureaus and full-time correspondents, as we've witnessed in other countries
that restrict freelancers, such as China and Vietnam.
Foreign Minister Don Pramudwinai was later more forthright
about the guideline policy's true intent, which he said in press interviews
would be used to curb "misleading" foreign coverage about Thailand.
It seems increasingly clear that the junta has handed down to the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs a "quota of elimination" for foreign reporters,
judging by Don's comments to local media that his ministry plans to reject some
10 percent of the 500 or so currently credentialed foreign correspondents in
the country. There are indications that officials are already conducting
investigations into individual reporters' backgrounds before they've applied
for renewals.
If all of the five new guidelines are strictly enforced,
including the requirement that journalists must work full-time for a registered
news organization, the eventual number of visa denials will be much, much
higher. At a time when Thailand aims to become a regional hub, the economic and
logistical center of the new ASEAN [Association of Southeast Asian Nations]
Economic Community, it is simultaneously moving to roll back the country's
long-held position as press freedom safe haven for reporters covering the wider
region.
All of this groundbreaking, investigative foreign reporting
is in the public interest and fair game in any democratic society where the
press is allowed to serve its checking and balancing role. And it's the type of
reporting, I venture, that Prayuth's junta deliberately aims to curb through
these arbitrary and vague new guidelines against the foreign press. While the
government insists it's working to reform and improve Thailand's democracy,
uprooting a diverse and robust foreign media presence in the country is
inconsistent with that supposed aim.
Allow me to take this opportunity to advocate that you,
either collectively or through your individual embassies, speak publicly or
lobby privately against these new guidelines against the foreign media as well
as continued restrictions and pressure on the local media. Thank you for your
attention.
[Source: https://cpj.org/blog/2016/03/thailand-aims-to-hollow-out-foreign-press-with-new.php]
No comments:
Post a Comment